InterviewStack.io LogoInterviewStack.io

Experimentation Strategy and Advanced Designs Questions

When and how to use advanced experimental methods and how to prioritize experiments to maximize learning and business impact. Candidates should understand factorial and multivariate designs interaction effects blocking and stratification sequential testing and adaptive designs and the trade offs between running many factors at once versus sequential A and B tests in terms of speed power and interpretability. The topic includes Bayesian and frequentist analysis choices techniques for detecting heterogeneous treatment effects and methods to control for multiple comparisons. At the strategy level candidates should be able to estimate expected impact effort confidence and reach for proposed experiments apply prioritization frameworks to select experiments and reason about parallelization limits resource constraints tooling and monitoring. Candidates should also be able to communicate complex experimental results recommend staged follow ups and design experiments to answer higher order questions about interactions and heterogeneity.

HardTechnical
0 practiced
You ran a 4-factor multivariate test with 3 levels each (81 cells) and observe several significant cells. Describe a rigorous analysis workflow to control false discoveries, identify robust main effects vs interactions, and propose a prioritized set of efficient follow-up experiments or rollouts.
EasyTechnical
0 practiced
Define heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE). Outline a simple approach to detect HTE using pre-specified subgroup analyses and explain the main risks (e.g., p-hacking) and mitigations (pre-registration, correction, replication).
HardTechnical
0 practiced
An initial experiment shows a potential interaction: personalization increases conversions primarily for price-sensitive customers. Design a staged follow-up plan to confirm causality, quantify segment-specific effects with appropriate power calculations, and outline a rollout strategy that balances revenue upside and fairness considerations.
MediumTechnical
0 practiced
An experiment shows a statistically significant lift right after launch but the team suspects a novelty effect. Outline an empirical validation strategy to establish persistence: cohort analysis over time, extended holdout groups, phased rollouts, and replication. For each, list pros and cons.
EasyTechnical
0 practiced
Explain p-values and confidence intervals in plain language for a non-technical stakeholder. Use this example to shape your explanation: treatment conversion 6.2% vs baseline 5.0%, p=0.03, 95% CI for absolute lift = [0.4%, 2.0%]. Provide example phrasing you would use to summarize the result and recommended next steps.

Unlock Full Question Bank

Get access to hundreds of Experimentation Strategy and Advanced Designs interview questions and detailed answers.

Sign in to Continue

Join thousands of developers preparing for their dream job.