Scope Management and Prioritization Questions

Covers how candidates make pragmatic trade offs between impact, effort, risk, and time when defining scope and setting priorities for projects and products. Topics include defining a minimum viable product, negotiating minimum viable scope, detecting and handling scope creep, and making go no go or defer decisions. Interviewers will probe prioritization frameworks and criteria, estimation approaches, metrics for evaluating impact and cost, change control processes, phased delivery and release planning, risk identification and mitigation strategies, and stakeholder alignment and communication. Candidates should be able to describe concrete processes, artifacts, and techniques such as roadmaps, release plans, backlog prioritization, trade off matrices, cost of delay analysis, risk registers, and examples where they protected schedules, restructured scope, or balanced quality, schedule, and team capacity to achieve outcomes.