InterviewStack.io LogoInterviewStack.io

Experimental Design and Analysis Pitfalls Questions

Covers the principles of designing credible experiments and the common errors that invalidate results. Topics include defining clear hypotheses and control and treatment groups, randomization strategies, blocking and stratification, sample size and power calculations, valid run length and avoiding early stopping, and handling unequal or missing samples. It also covers analysis level pitfalls such as multiple comparisons and appropriate corrections, selection bias and nonrandom assignment, data quality issues, seasonal and temporal confounds, network effects and interference, and paradoxes such as Simpson paradox. Candidates should be able to critique flawed experiment designs, identify specific failure modes, quantify their impact, and propose concrete mitigations such as pre registration, A and B testing best practices, adjustment methods, intention to treat analysis, A over A checks, cluster randomization, and robustness checks.

EasyTechnical
0 practiced
Define statistical power and significance level (alpha) in the context of an A/B test. Explain Type I and Type II errors using a business example: e.g., rolling out a feature that might increase conversions but also increases operational costs. How do power and alpha relate to business trade-offs?
MediumTechnical
0 practiced
A client-side bug dropped about 15% of events in the treatment group for one week. How would you detect this problem using logs and metrics, estimate how much bias it introduced into conversion estimates, and decide whether to abort the experiment, adjust the analysis, or rerun the test? Provide concrete diagnostic and remediation steps.
MediumTechnical
0 practiced
An experiment ended and treatment has 150k users while control has 20k users due to a rollout bug. Describe how you would analyze the data to account for unequal sample sizes and exposure time. Discuss weighting, regression adjustment, variance estimation, and when truncating or rebalancing data might be appropriate.
MediumTechnical
0 practiced
You have dozens of engagement metrics. Describe a principled process to select a single primary metric for experiments to avoid false discoveries. Include how to align metric choice with business objectives, trade-offs between leading and lagging indicators, and how to define guardrail metrics to detect harm.
HardTechnical
0 practiced
Define p-hacking and HARKing. As a Data Analyst, propose concrete company policies and technical controls (for example: mandatory pre-registration, experiment registry with immutable entries, automated analysis templates, code review gates, peer audits) to reduce these practices. Discuss trade-offs and how to measure policy effectiveness.

Unlock Full Question Bank

Get access to hundreds of Experimental Design and Analysis Pitfalls interview questions and detailed answers.

Sign in to Continue

Join thousands of developers preparing for their dream job.